DataEngPrep.tech
QuestionsPracticeAI CoachDashboardPacksBlog
ProLogin
Home/Questions/SQL/Difference between where and having clause with examples.

Difference between where and having clause with examples.

SQLmedium0.6 min read

**Architectural Logic**: WHERE filters rows before aggregation; HAVING filters groups after aggregation. Execution order: FROM → WHERE → GROUP BY → aggregates → HAVING → SELECT. **Why**: WHERE enables predicate pushdown—filtering early reduces rows before shuffle and...

🤖 Practice this in AI Interview
Frequency
Low
Asked at 2 companies
Category
487
questions in SQL
Difficulty Split
130E|271M|86H
in this category
Total Bank
1,863
across 7 categories
Asked at these companies
PresidioSwiggy
Interview Pro Tip

Red Flag: Putting non-aggregate filters in HAVING (e.g., HAVING region = 'US')—wastes compute. Pro-Move: 'I always ask: can this filter run before GROUP BY? If yes, it goes in WHERE.'

Why This Question Matters

This medium-level SQL question appears frequently in data engineering interviews at companies like Presidio, Swiggy. While less common, it tests deeper understanding that distinguishes strong candidates.

How to Approach This

Break this problem into components. Identify the core trade-offs involved, then walk the interviewer through your reasoning step by step. Demonstrate awareness of edge cases and production considerations - this is what separates good answers from great ones.

Expert Answer
121 words

Architectural Logic: WHERE filters rows before aggregation; HAVING filters groups after aggregation. Execution order: FROM → WHERE → GROUP BY → aggregates → HAVING → SELECT. Why: WHERE enables predicate pushdown—filtering early reduces rows before shuffle and aggregation, saving memory and I/O. HAVING operates on aggregates; pushing filter logic into WHERE when possible is critical for performance. Scalability: A filter in HAVING forces full aggregation of all groups; moving filterable predicates to WHERE (e.g., date range) can reduce groups by orders of magnitude. Cost: HAVING SUM(salary) > 100000 scans all dept groups; WHERE dept IN (...) reduces groups first. Example: SELECT dept, SUM(salary) FROM emp WHERE age > 25 GROUP BY dept HAVING SUM(salary) > 100000—WHERE prunes rows; HAVING prunes departments.

The complete answer continues with detailed implementation patterns, architectural trade-offs, and production-grade considerations covering performance optimization and real-world examples.

This answer is partially locked

Unlock the full expert answer with code examples and trade-offs

Recommended

Start AI Mock Interview

Practice real interviews with AI feedback, track progress, and get interview-ready faster.

  • Unlimited AI mock interviews
  • Instant feedback & scoring
  • Full answers to 1,800+ questions
  • Resume analyzer & SQL playground
Create Free Account

Pro starts at $19/mo - cancel anytime

Just need answers for quick revision?

Download curated PDF interview packs

Interview Packs
R
P
A
S

Trusted by 10,000+ aspiring data engineers

AmazonGoogleDatabricksSnowflakeMeta
Related Study Guide
🎯

Presidio Data Engineer Interview Questions & Answers (2026)

Practice the 52 most asked data engineering questions at Presidio. Covers SQL, Spark/Big Data, General/Other and more.

10 min read →

Related SQL Questions

mediumWrite an SQL query to find the second-highest salary from an employee table.FreemediumDemonstrate the difference between DENSE_RANK() and RANK()FreemediumDiscuss differences between ROW_NUMBER(), RANK(), and DENSE_RANK(), and provide examples from your projects.FreemediumExplain the differences between Data Warehouse, Data Lake, and Delta LakeFreemediumExplain the differences between Repartition and Coalesce. When would you use each?Free

According to DataEngPrep.tech, this is one of the most frequently asked SQL interview questions, reported at 2 companies. DataEngPrep.tech maintains a curated database of 1,863+ real data engineering interview questions across 7 categories, verified by industry professionals.

← Back to all questionsMore SQL questions →