Reviewed by Aditya Kumar · Last reviewed 2026-03-24
Shallow copy ( copy.copy() ) creates a new top level object but populates it with references to the original's nested objects. Deep copy ( copy.deepcopy() ) creates a new top level object and…
Red Flag: Defining both without explaining when nested mutation matters. Pro-Move: 'We had a bug—shallow copy of config; workers mutated nested dict and corrupted each other. Switched to deepcopy for worker config'—shows debugging experience.
This easy-level Python/Coding question appears frequently in data engineering interviews at companies like Delivery Hero, Dunnhumby, Fragma Data Systems. While less common, it tests deeper understanding that distinguishes strong candidates. Mastering the underlying concepts (python) will help you answer variations of this question confidently.
Start by clearly defining the core concept being asked about. Interviewers want to see that you understand the fundamentals before diving into implementation details. Structure your answer with a definition, then explain the practical application with a concise example. The expert answer includes a code example that demonstrates the implementation pattern.
Shallow copy (copy.copy()) creates a new top-level object but populates it with references to the original's nested objects. Deep copy (copy.deepcopy()) creates a new top-level object and recursively copies all nested objects, ensuring complete independence.
A shallow copy is efficient as it only copies the top-level structure. If the original object contains mutable nested objects (like lists or dictionaries), modifying these nested objects in the shallow copy will also affect the original, because both objects refer to the same nested objects. This can lead to unexpected side effects, especially in concurrent or distributed data processing where state management is critical.
A deep copy, conversely, recursively constructs a completely new, independent copy of the entire object graph. Every nested mutable object is duplicated, ensuring that changes to the deep copy have no impact on the original. This provides full isolation but comes with a performance cost, as it involves traversing and copying potentially complex, large data structures. For instance, copying a large nested dictionary representing a Spark job configuration could involve significant overhead.
Consider a list of lists:
import copy
original = [[1, 2], [3, 4]]
shallow_copy = copy.copy(original)
deep_copy = copy.deepcopy(original)
shallow_copy[0][0] = 99
deep_copy[1][0] = 88
# original is now [[99, 2], [3, 4]]
# shallow_copy is [[99, 2], [3, 4]]
# deep_copy is [[1, 2], [88, 4]]
Here, modifying shallow_copy[0][0] also changed original[0][0] because they reference the same inner list. deep_copy remains fully independent.
In data pipelines, you might use a shallow copy for a configuration dictionary before passing it to workers if you only expect top-level keys to be modified or if nested values are guaranteed to be immutable (e.g., a list of Kafka topic names). However, if workers need to modify nested mutable structures within their own isolated context (e.g., updating a nested dictionary representing a specific task's parameters), a deep copy is essential to prevent unintended shared state mutations across different tasks or executors. This is crucial for maintaining data integrity and predictable behavior in systems like Spark or Flink.
Prefer immutable data structures (tuples, frozensets) whenever possible to avoid the need for copying altogether, simplifying state management and reducing potential bugs.
Red Flag: Defining both without explaining when nested mutation matters. Pro-Move: 'We had a bug—shallow copy of config; workers mutated nested dict and corrupted each other. Switched to deepcopy for worker config'—shows debugging experience.
Some links below are affiliate links. If you buy through them we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you — it helps keep DataEngPrep free.
According to DataEngPrep.tech, this is one of the most frequently asked Python/Coding interview questions, reported at 3 companies. DataEngPrep.tech maintains an editor-reviewed database of 1,863 data engineering interview questions across 7 categories.