Reviewed by Aditya Kumar · Last reviewed 2026-08-08
Do it in two steps: collapse transactions to one row per month, then run a windowed running total over those monthly rows. Why aggregate first Running the window directly over raw transactions returns…
This medium-level SQL question appears frequently in data engineering interviews at companies like Bitwise. While less common, it tests deeper understanding that distinguishes strong candidates. Mastering the underlying concepts (partition) will help you answer variations of this question confidently.
Break this problem into components. Identify the core trade-offs involved, then walk the interviewer through your reasoning step by step. Demonstrate awareness of edge cases and production considerations - this is what separates good answers from great ones. The expert answer includes a code example that demonstrates the implementation pattern.
Do it in two steps: collapse transactions to one row per month, then run a windowed running total over those monthly rows.
WITH monthly AS (
SELECT DATE_TRUNC('month', txn_date) AS month,
SUM(amount) AS monthly_amount
FROM transactions
GROUP BY 1
)
SELECT month,
monthly_amount,
SUM(monthly_amount) OVER (
ORDER BY month
ROWS BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND CURRENT ROW
) AS cumulative_amount
FROM monthly
ORDER BY month;
Running the window directly over raw transactions returns a cumulative value per transaction, not per month. Collapsing to monthly grain first is what makes the output one row per month.
Omitting ROWS BETWEEN gives you the SQL default of RANGE BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND CURRENT ROW. RANGE is value-based: every row with the same ORDER BY value is folded into the same frame. Here the CTE guarantees one row per month, so both produce identical results. But if duplicate months ever reach that window, RANGE returns the same total for each of them while ROWS increments row by row. Being explicit costs nothing and makes intent unambiguous.
Add a partition, and the total restarts for each customer:
SUM(monthly_amount) OVER (PARTITION BY customer_id ORDER BY month
ROWS BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND CURRENT ROW)
A cumulative series usually needs to be continuous. Months with zero transactions simply do not exist in transactions, so the running total skips them and any chart drawn from it is misleading. Generate a calendar spine and LEFT JOIN the aggregate onto it, using COALESCE(monthly_amount, 0) before the window so the total carries forward flat across empty months.
Note that DATE_TRUNC is PostgreSQL, Spark and Snowflake syntax; BigQuery uses DATE_TRUNC(txn_date, MONTH) with the arguments reversed.
In the interview, also mention that a cumulative total is a single pass over sorted data, which is why it scales far better than a self join on month <= month.
Red Flag: Calculating cumulative in application. Pro-Move: 'Window in warehouse—we use for YoY growth (LAG 12 months).'
Some links below are affiliate links. If you buy through them we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you — it helps keep DataEngPrep free.
According to DataEngPrep.tech, this is one of the most frequently asked SQL interview questions, reported at 1 company. DataEngPrep.tech maintains an editor-reviewed database of 1,863 data engineering interview questions across 7 categories.