Reviewed by Aditya Kumar · Last reviewed 2026-08-08
To combine records by name with concatenated course values, use an aggregate string function along with a GROUP BY clause on the name column. This technique is commonly used for denormalization,…
This easy-level General/Other question appears frequently in data engineering interviews at companies like Pubmatic. While less common, it tests deeper understanding that distinguishes strong candidates. Mastering the underlying concepts (spark, sql) will help you answer variations of this question confidently.
Start by clearly defining the core concept being asked about. Interviewers want to see that you understand the fundamentals before diving into implementation details. Structure your answer with a definition, then explain the practical application with a concise example. The expert answer includes a code example that demonstrates the implementation pattern.
To combine records by name with concatenated course values, use an aggregate string function along with a GROUP BY clause on the name column. This technique is commonly used for denormalization, reporting, or displaying related items in a single field.
The core mechanism involves grouping rows by a common identifier (e.g., name) and then aggregating a string column (e.g., course) into a single string using a specified delimiter. In PostgreSQL and SQL Server, the STRING_AGG(column, delimiter ORDER BY column) function is used. MySQL provides GROUP_CONCAT(column ORDER BY column SEPARATOR delimiter). For distributed systems like Apache Spark (PySpark), this is achieved by first collecting values into a list using collect_list('column') or collect_set('column') (for deduplication), and then concatenating them with concat_ws(delimiter, array_column). The ORDER BY clause within these functions ensures a consistent and predictable order of concatenated elements.
Consider the following SQL example using STRING_AGG:
SELECT
name,
STRING_AGG(course, ', ' ORDER BY course) AS courses
FROM
student_courses
GROUP BY
name;
Key considerations and best practices include handling NULL values (most STRING_AGG implementations ignore NULLs by default, but it's good to be aware), choosing a separator that won't conflict with data values, and being mindful of potential length limits for the resulting string (e.g., GROUP_CONCAT has a configurable group_concat_max_len in MySQL). Performance can be a concern for very large groups, especially in distributed environments where collect_list might lead to memory issues on a single executor if a group's list becomes excessively large, potentially causing data skew and shuffle overhead.
In the interview, also mention the performance implications of string aggregation on large datasets and discuss alternative storage strategies like storing courses as an array or JSON if the downstream system supports it, which can offer better query flexibility and avoid string length limitations.
Pro-Move: 'We use collect_set then array_sort then concat_ws—consistent order and dedupe; some DBs have 32K limit.' Red Flag: collect_list without ORDER BY—non-deterministic output.
Some links below are affiliate links. If you buy through them we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you — it helps keep DataEngPrep free.
According to DataEngPrep.tech, this is one of the most frequently asked General/Other interview questions, reported at 1 company. DataEngPrep.tech maintains an editor-reviewed database of 1,863 data engineering interview questions across 7 categories.